California Governor Newsom Vetoes AI Safety Bill Amid Industry Pressure

 

Governor Gavin Newsom of California has recently vetoed SB1047, a landmark artificial intelligence safety bill. The bill aimed to address safety concerns with large AI models but excluded smaller ones, a key reason Newsom cited for his rejection. He argued that the bill's narrow focus left significant gaps, advocating instead for comprehensive AI regulation.

Despite opposition, SB1047 garnered broad support. The California legislature passed it with a strong majority, and national and state polls reflected public backing, with up to 80% of Americans urging Newsom to sign the bill. Leading AI researchers, along with employees from top AI companies, endorsed it.

The core of the bill held AI developers accountable for any harm their models caused if they failed to implement adequate safety measures. This provision was popular among voters, with an August poll showing 80% of Californians in favor. However, some polls were conducted by groups sympathetic to the bill, leading opponents to dismiss the results as biased.

Newsom’s decision sparked questions, especially given the bill's popularity. Key players in the AI industry, including companies like Google, Meta, and OpenAI, strongly resisted the bill. These companies, which have operated largely under self-regulation, lobbied intensely to prevent the bill from passing. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz also opposed the legislation, funding a campaign to derail it and hiring lobbyists with ties to Newsom.

Several high-profile California politicians, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, joined the opposition. In a letter backed by industry leaders, eight congressional Democrats urged Newsom to veto the bill. Pelosi herself issued a statement against SB1047, citing industry concerns.

Critics, including the bill's supporters, argue that industry pressure played a significant role in Newsom’s veto. AI safety advocates, such as Sunny Gandhi from Encode Justice, expressed disappointment, stating that the bill reflected public concerns over unchecked AI development. Gandhi noted the growing divide between Silicon Valley’s priorities and the fears of average citizens, particularly regarding the potential dangers of AI.

As AI continues to evolve, the debate over how to regulate the technology remains at the forefront of both state and national discussions. Newsom’s veto has brought attention to the delicate balance between innovation and safety, with many calling for stronger measures to address the risks posed by advanced AI systems.